News, News briefs

NEWS BRIEFS: Sanford says coronavirus relief bill is a bad idea

Sanford. Photo via Charleston City Paper.

Editor’s Note:  The first report is republished from our sister publication, the Charleston City Paper.

By Lindsay Street, Statehouse correspondent  |  After ending a quixotic Republican challenge to President Donald Trump, former S.C. Gov. Mark Sanford retreated to what he calls “the Farm,” family property at Coosaw Plantation an hour south of Charleston. Describing himself as “random ex-governor trying to figure out what he’s going to do next,” Sanford has mostly kept to himself during the coronavirus pandemic sweeping the state and nation

But the former governor and unapologetic libertarian still has thoughts — a lot of them — on the federal government’s ever-growing debt, especially with the recently approved $2.2 trillion aid and stimulus package. Those $1,200 checks for taxpayers are “nonsensical and dangerous in economic terms,” in Sanford’s estimation.

“These are non-offset funds, which means we are going straight to the Chinese and other lenders around the world or to ourselves and borrowing the money,” he said. “You’re putting in the one pocket and taking out the other … We’re digging some mighty, mighty holes.”

As governor, Sanford tried to reject the 2009 federal stimulus, passed in response to the Great Recession. A short battle ensued, leading to the state Supreme Court making a ruling and releasing the money. (A headline from the time said Sanford got “trumped.”)

For a few months in 2019, Sanford sought to create a national dialogue on fiscal responsibility mounting a GOP presidential primary challenge. He gained little traction before ending “the presidential thing.” Trumped again.

In the current crisis, Sanford said the federal government should be doing what families in the Lowcountry are doing right now: prioritize spending. He said sending people a check that accounts for a small percentage of their personal income in a time when evictions and foreclosures are halted will likely just lead to folks hoarding cash, not spending in stores that may not even be open.

“People are not going to go on a spending binge on this when they are fearing what is going to happen next,” he said.

Unlike the 2009 stimulus, which was doled out through states, this year’s disbursements will be sent directly from the federal government. Meaning, there’s no way for any Sanford-esque governors to turn down the aid dollars.

House, Senate to convene April 8; a look at 2020 elections

The S.C. House of Representatives and S.C. Senate will meet April 8 after the coronavirus pandemic interrupted the session.

Members will vote on a continuing resolution that will allow state government to operate as-is into the 2020-2021 budget that begins July 1. In other words, they’ll use this year’s budget for next year.  And in case they want to change something, they will also vote on a sine die resolution, which will allow them to take up items after the scheduled end of session in May. 

On April 9, the state’s revenue forecasters will convene on a conference call to talk about the coronavirus pandemic’s impact to the state budget. For more information, click here. That page will be updated the day before or day of the meeting for the call-in number. 

Share

One Comment

  1. Krugman understands that the principal job of economic policy right now isn’t to provide stimulus, that is, to sustain employment and G.D.P. It is, instead, to provide life support — to limit the hardship of Americans who have temporarily lost their incomes.

    Sanford does not have a clue about this.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.