Staff reports | Progress on open carry gun legislation remained stalled in the S.C. General Assembly this week as infighting among gun-rights groups over differences between the House- and Senate-passed versions of the bill threatened to derail the measure.
Dubbed “constitutional carry” by supporters, the legislation would allow South Carolinians to carry handguns openly or in a concealed fashion without a permit, with specific exceptions for facilities like schools, hospitals and public buildings. Both versions of the bill would also stiffen penalties for certain firearms offenses, including unlawful possession of a gun – provisions that many saw as key to muting local law enforcement officials’ oft-stated objections to the proposal.
Proponents say the bill would simply bring South Carolina into line with the majority of U.S. states that already allow open carry, while opponents argue that the laws in those states are often quite different from the proposed South Carolina legislation. For instance, in Pennsylvania where open carry is generally allowed, Philadelphia is specifically exempted due to its high population density. No such geographical exclusions exist in either the state House or Senate versions currently under consideration.
But with large majorities in both chambers favoring open carry in principle, the real sticking points are a series of National Rifle Association-approved Senate amendments that have drawn the ire of less compromise-oriented groups such as the National Association for Gun Rights and its state affiliate, Palmetto Gun Rights (PGR). Those amendments include provisions that would increase penalties for carrying a gun in restricted locations, require the state to provide free monthly gun training classes in all 46 counties, and allow members of the legislature to carry in restricted locations without penalty.
“We are tired of the compromises,” PGR executive director Tommy Dimsdale said in a recent video. “We are tired of waiting, we are tired of backroom deals, and we are tired of South Carolina Republicans circling the wagons around their colleagues, weakening good bills so that weaker members get to vote on them and pretend that they are pro-gun.”
With the two chambers seemingly deadlocked over the Senate amendments, a conference committee with members from both bodies will try to find a workable compromise as quickly as possible.
“I haven’t heard that there’s going to be any effort to delay the conference committee meetings,” said Senate Majority Leader Shane Massey. “I think everybody would like to work out the issue if we can.”
- Have a comment? Send to: feedback@statehousereport.com.
We Can Do Better, South Carolina!
We need fewer guns on our streets or in our gathering places, not more. This is redneckery run amok. Our law enforcement agencies don’t want more guns on our streets either. It would be nice if the proponents of “constitutional carry” were to recognize that there are more amendments to the Constitution that the already tortured Second.
If legislators want to carry in restricted areas I think everyone should be able as well . They are no better than us.
Why do our elected officials feel they should have special allowances? They get enough in retirement and health care. If I can’t carry in a restricted location, why do they think they should be allowed to? All laws should apply equally to everyone.
I am not in favor of open carry. Too much at stake unless there is a very rigorous background and mental capacity check. Too many loose cannons out there
LIKE